Our good friend @Steve Palmer just posted a poll on LinkedIn.
Your input may help highlight what’s challenging so we can make Knack even better.
Please share your thoughts!
Our good friend @Steve Palmer just posted a poll on LinkedIn.
Your input may help highlight what’s challenging so we can make Knack even better.
Please share your thoughts!
I knew I was not a normal Knack Builder LOL
For UI, I just had 1h ago a great example. Various times in the past I tried to target an image in a grid view and the CSS code would not work. This time I gave Perplexity a screeshot of the App and the image, and the inspection console opened beneath. Giving it also the working code to do that in a details view.
BOOM! At the first anser it gave me the solution! oh myyyyy. That is the fastest code resolution I ever had with IA. Amazing…
The most time for me is to create various views in a scene for the diferent roles, and testing them. That is the way I structure my apps. Login users pages, and pages rules for roles. I know that the Builders Pages is structured for login per roles. But I don’t see the lean way of copying most of all pages as many roles I have.
And maybe it is not the best way.
I answered to your pool with the “User/role” permission because it was not possible to rank the anwers, my second choice it would be “Workflow/automation”
But as far as I know the permission argument is a recurring issue on a lot of low-code platforms. The majority of them address this needs as Knack do: pushing to develop differents UI pieces for each role. The results are:
PRO (for Knack)
CONS (for Knack developers)
In summary, it would be better to have a way to handle permissions at a data level instead of acting at UI level. But we can’t complain too much with this, because I am aware that addressing this kind of work it means a total different kind of low-code platforms with an associate total different price… and the ratio price/functionality is still a plus for Knack.